Command R+ vs GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna is ~88% cheaper than Command R+ on output tokens. Both are capability tier 5. GPT-5.6 Luna has the larger context window.

Command R+GPT-5.6 Luna
VendorCohereOpenAI
Capability tier5/85/8
Size classBALANCEDFAST
Parameters104B—
Context window131,0721,050,000 ✓
Input $/M$2.50$0.20
Output $/M$10$1.20 ✓
Cached input $/M—$0.10

Which should you choose?

Both sit at capability tier 5, so GPT-5.6 Luna is usually the better value at ~88% lower output cost, and it also carries the larger 1,050,000-token context window. Because they're the same tier, benchmark both on your own prompts before committing — list price rarely predicts task quality.

At 10M input + 10M output tokens / month
Command R+: $125.00GPT-5.6 Luna: $14.00Δ $111.00/mo

FAQ

Is Command R+ cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna?

GPT-5.6 Luna is the cheaper of the two on output tokens ($1.20/M vs $10/M), about 88% less.

Command R+ vs GPT-5.6 Luna: which has a bigger context window?

GPT-5.6 Luna has the larger context window (1,050,000 tokens).

Which is more capable, Command R+ or GPT-5.6 Luna?

Both sit at the same capability tier (5/8) — pick on price, context, or benchmark them on your prompts.

Command R+ or GPT-5.6 Luna: which should I use?

Both sit at capability tier 5, so GPT-5.6 Luna is usually the better value at ~88% lower output cost, and it also carries the larger 1,050,000-token context window. Because they're the same tier, benchmark both on your own prompts before committing — list price rarely predicts task quality.

How much more does Command R+ cost than GPT-5.6 Luna?

At 10M input + 10M output tokens per month, Command R+ runs about $125.00 and GPT-5.6 Luna about $14.00 — a difference of $111.00 per month at that volume.

Settle it on your own prompts

List prices only go so far — benchmark Command R+ and GPT-5.6 Luna on your actual workload for measured cost, latency and quality.

Pricing and specs maintained by Mintok's catalog watchers from public sources. Not investment advice. Methodology.