Gemma 4 31B vs Mistral NeMo
Mistral NeMo is ~57% cheaper than Gemma 4 31B on output tokens. Both are capability tier 3.
| Gemma 4 31B | Mistral NeMo | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Mistral | |
| Capability tier | 3/8 | 3/8 |
| Size class | FAST | NANO |
| Parameters | 31B | — |
| Context window | 262,144 | — |
| Input $/M | $0.12 | $0.15 |
| Output $/M | $0.35 | $0.15 ✓ |
| Cached input $/M | $0.09 | — |
Which should you choose?
Both sit at capability tier 3, so Mistral NeMo is usually the better value at ~57% lower output cost. Because they're the same tier, benchmark both on your own prompts before committing — list price rarely predicts task quality.
FAQ
Is Gemma 4 31B cheaper than Mistral NeMo?
Mistral NeMo is the cheaper of the two on output tokens ($0.15/M vs $0.35/M), about 57% less.
Gemma 4 31B vs Mistral NeMo: which has a bigger context window?
Both list the same context window (262,144 tokens).
Which is more capable, Gemma 4 31B or Mistral NeMo?
Both sit at the same capability tier (3/8) — pick on price, context, or benchmark them on your prompts.
Gemma 4 31B or Mistral NeMo: which should I use?
Both sit at capability tier 3, so Mistral NeMo is usually the better value at ~57% lower output cost. Because they're the same tier, benchmark both on your own prompts before committing — list price rarely predicts task quality.
How much more does Gemma 4 31B cost than Mistral NeMo?
At 10M input + 10M output tokens per month, Gemma 4 31B runs about $4.70 and Mistral NeMo about $3.00 — a difference of $1.70 per month at that volume.
Settle it on your own prompts
List prices only go so far — benchmark Gemma 4 31B and Mistral NeMo on your actual workload for measured cost, latency and quality.
Pricing and specs maintained by Mintok's catalog watchers from public sources. Not investment advice. Methodology.