GPT-5.2 vs Qwen3.7 Max
Qwen3.7 Max is ~73% cheaper than GPT-5.2 on output tokens. Both are capability tier 6. Qwen3.7 Max has the larger context window.
| GPT-5.2 | Qwen3.7 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | OpenAI | Alibaba |
| Capability tier | 6/8 | 6/8 |
| Size class | BALANCED | FLAGSHIP |
| Parameters | — | 1,000B |
| Context window | 400,000 | 1,000,000 ✓ |
| Input $/M | $1.75 | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | $14 | $3.75 ✓ |
| Cached input $/M | $0.17 | $0.25 |
Which should you choose?
Both sit at capability tier 6, so Qwen3.7 Max is usually the better value at ~73% lower output cost, and it also carries the larger 1,000,000-token context window. Because they're the same tier, benchmark both on your own prompts before committing — list price rarely predicts task quality.
FAQ
Is GPT-5.2 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max?
Qwen3.7 Max is the cheaper of the two on output tokens ($3.75/M vs $14/M), about 73% less.
GPT-5.2 vs Qwen3.7 Max: which has a bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Max has the larger context window (1,000,000 tokens).
Which is more capable, GPT-5.2 or Qwen3.7 Max?
Both sit at the same capability tier (6/8) — pick on price, context, or benchmark them on your prompts.
GPT-5.2 or Qwen3.7 Max: which should I use?
Both sit at capability tier 6, so Qwen3.7 Max is usually the better value at ~73% lower output cost, and it also carries the larger 1,000,000-token context window. Because they're the same tier, benchmark both on your own prompts before committing — list price rarely predicts task quality.
How much more does GPT-5.2 cost than Qwen3.7 Max?
At 10M input + 10M output tokens per month, GPT-5.2 runs about $157.50 and Qwen3.7 Max about $50.00 — a difference of $107.50 per month at that volume.
Settle it on your own prompts
List prices only go so far — benchmark GPT-5.2 and Qwen3.7 Max on your actual workload for measured cost, latency and quality.
Pricing and specs maintained by Mintok's catalog watchers from public sources. Not investment advice. Methodology.