LLaMA 3 70B vs LLaMA 4 Scout
Both are capability tier 4. LLaMA 4 Scout has the larger context window.
| LLaMA 3 70B | LLaMA 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Meta | Meta |
| Capability tier | 4/8 | 4/8 |
| Size class | BALANCED | FAST |
| Parameters | 70B | 109B |
| Context window | 8,192 | 10,000,000 ✓ |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Cached input $/M | — | — |
FAQ
Is LLaMA 3 70B cheaper than LLaMA 4 Scout?
Pricing isn't listed for both models — at least one is open-weights (self-host). Use the Mintok sizing report to compare $/M-token.
LLaMA 3 70B vs LLaMA 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?
LLaMA 4 Scout has the larger context window (10,000,000 tokens).
Which is more capable, LLaMA 3 70B or LLaMA 4 Scout?
Both sit at the same capability tier (4/8) — pick on price, context, or benchmark them on your prompts.
Settle it on your own prompts
List prices only go so far — benchmark LLaMA 3 70B and LLaMA 4 Scout on your actual workload for measured cost, latency and quality.
Pricing and specs maintained by Mintok's catalog watchers from public sources. Not investment advice. Methodology.