LLaMA 4 Scout vs Qwen 2.5 72B
LLaMA 4 Scout is ~25% cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B on output tokens. Both are capability tier 4. LLaMA 4 Scout has the larger context window.
| LLaMA 4 Scout | Qwen 2.5 72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Meta | Alibaba |
| Capability tier | 4/8 | 4/8 |
| Size class | FAST | BALANCED |
| Parameters | 109B | 72B |
| Context window | 10,000,000 ✓ | 131,072 |
| Input $/M | $0.10 | $0.36 |
| Output $/M | $0.30 ✓ | $0.40 |
| Cached input $/M | — | — |
Which should you choose?
Both sit at capability tier 4, so LLaMA 4 Scout is usually the better value at ~25% lower output cost, and it also carries the larger 10,000,000-token context window. Because they're the same tier, benchmark both on your own prompts before committing — list price rarely predicts task quality.
FAQ
Is LLaMA 4 Scout cheaper than Qwen 2.5 72B?
LLaMA 4 Scout is the cheaper of the two on output tokens ($0.30/M vs $0.40/M), about 25% less.
LLaMA 4 Scout vs Qwen 2.5 72B: which has a bigger context window?
LLaMA 4 Scout has the larger context window (10,000,000 tokens).
Which is more capable, LLaMA 4 Scout or Qwen 2.5 72B?
Both sit at the same capability tier (4/8) — pick on price, context, or benchmark them on your prompts.
LLaMA 4 Scout or Qwen 2.5 72B: which should I use?
Both sit at capability tier 4, so LLaMA 4 Scout is usually the better value at ~25% lower output cost, and it also carries the larger 10,000,000-token context window. Because they're the same tier, benchmark both on your own prompts before committing — list price rarely predicts task quality.
How much more does LLaMA 4 Scout cost than Qwen 2.5 72B?
At 10M input + 10M output tokens per month, LLaMA 4 Scout runs about $4.00 and Qwen 2.5 72B about $7.60 — a difference of $3.60 per month at that volume.
Settle it on your own prompts
List prices only go so far — benchmark LLaMA 4 Scout and Qwen 2.5 72B on your actual workload for measured cost, latency and quality.
Pricing and specs maintained by Mintok's catalog watchers from public sources. Not investment advice. Methodology.