Vera Rubin vs TPU v7 (Ironwood)
| Vera Rubin | TPU v7 (Ironwood) | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | NVIDIA | |
| Architecture | Rubin | TPU |
| BF16 TFLOPS | 35,000 ✓ | 2,307 |
| Memory (GB) | 288 ✓ | 192 |
| Bandwidth (GB/s) | 22,000 ✓ | 7,370 |
| TDP (W) | 1,400 | 600 ✓ |
| Cloud $/hr | — | $5.50 |
| TFLOPS / W | 25.0 ✓ | 3.8 |
FAQ
Vera Rubin vs TPU v7 (Ironwood): which is faster?
Vera Rubin has higher BF16 throughput (35,000 vs 2,307 TFLOPS).
Which has more memory?
Vera Rubin carries more on-package memory (288 GB vs 192 GB).
Which is cheaper to rent?
Cloud rates aren't listed for both chips — see each chip's page.
Cost either chip in a fleet
Size a deployment or see the full priced rack BOM these accelerators sit in.
Specs + modeled rates maintained by Mintok's catalog watchers from public sources. Not investment advice. Methodology.